Movie Review - Brotherly Love (2018)
If it's not homophobia, then one has to wonder what the central conflict is in this movie about a gay man who is deciding to make a life for himself working in the Catholic Church. Again, it's not homophobia because it's made clear that all the Catholics, including the so-assumed priests and friars, in this story have no problem with the protagonist being gay. There's some question of whether the main guy will take the job in the church and fully become like a friar, but the stakes don't feel as dire as maybe the book presents. The only other question is the one in countless romantic comedies and that's the inevitable and often predictable "will they or won't they."
Yet, Sapienza's book and by extension this movie challenge how unencumbered Judge's life actually was, if not from an external standpoint than from an internal one. This movie could even come across as a rebuke of the mendicant order or at least some aspects of the consecrated life. Vito and the men in his order are called "Brother." They're friars, men who take the same vows as monks but don't cloister themselves. Instead, they can live in the world to counsel others or to evangelize, but they do take the same vows as monks, that of poverty, chastity and obedience.
There isn't much rebuke of poverty and obedience. The rebuke is mostly aimed at chastity. Caruso in fact opens the movie outside a porn video store. Vito is then tempted into having sex with a man inside a car parked behind the building. Instead of entering the mendicant order at a young age, Vito entered late and after already engaging in same-sex relations and other things he now has to give up to be a friar. The other things don't bother him as much as the sex part.
At first, Vito argues that it is possible to divorce sex from love and that he can have love in his life without the kind of sex or intimacy that the average person has or desires, which is presumably how Father Judge lived his life. However, when Vito visits Austin, Texas, for the summer to volunteer at a AIDS charity house, he encounters person after person who practically argue the opposite. That alone would have been fine, but Caruso's movie seems to go a step further to suggest that anything other than a monogamous, sexual relationship is less than fulfilling in life. Caruso's movie seems to suggest that celibacy can't be fulfilling, at least celibacy in terms of non-intercourse, which again flies in the face of the life of Mychal Judge. He was celibate, which Caruso's film suggests wasn't fulfilling.
Derek Babb co-stars as Gabe Rimes, a landscaper in Austin who does the lawn and garden for the AIDS charity house. He's recently divorced, having broken up with his wife after realizing he's gay. His parents disowned him. After being somewhat lonely, he sees and takes a liking to Vito and asks him out to a country-western spot. Another character mentions love-at-first-sight, which is basically what happens to Gabe upon his initial meeting of Vito.
Otherwise, it's not really clear why these two would fall in love. The two don't seem to have much in common. Vito likes to go to bars with his friends. Gabe doesn't really like the gay nightlife. Gabe is more a beer person, whereas Vito is more a wine person. Gabe is a Cat Stevens fan, but Vito's not into it. One of Vito's favorite movies is Yentl (1983), but Gabe isn't into that film at all. Gabe doesn't get most, if not all of Vito's pop culture references. The exception is a mutual knowledge of Golden Girls but they jokingly say that that's knowledge all gay men have, so it's not underlined why these two are attracted to one another other than for purely lustful reasons.
It could be the cliché that opposites attract. Vito is more extroverted, gregarious and charming, whereas Gabe is more introverted and perhaps more guarded. It's perhaps not so confusing why Gabe would be taken by Vito but it is confusing why he would do so to the exclusion of other guys. When another, sexy guy named Jim, played by Oryan Landa, shows interest in him, Gabe brushes it off. Vito makes it clear that he's celibate and is avoiding any kind of relations. Gabe then makes a comment about wanting what you can't have. That's Vito in a nutshell, which may fuel Gabe's attraction, but it's being unnecessarily aggressive and forward for someone whom you know would have to break vows and violate their personal beliefs just to be with you. The naughtiness of that could also fuel Gabe's attraction, but that's not what Gabe's personality seems to indicate at all, so I don't get Gabe's almost instant devotion. Normally, in any romance, the two characters would undergo some trying situation that would bond them or one would engage in some act that directly helps or assists the other. Beside watching TV, that doesn't really happen for these two.
For example, Vito is allegedly supposed to be working at the AIDS charity house, but we don't actually see him doing much of anything. He talks to one of the residents there, an elderly man named Joe, played by David Blackwell, a HIV-positive, former TV scribe, but other than that, we have no clue what Vito has been doing all summer. We have no clue what his work is. When the people at the charity throw him a party, it feels unearned. The movie gives us no sense of Vito's days beyond his conversations with Gabe.
The movie opens with a Bible quote, which Gloria repeats. "I have come to give you life, and give it to the full" (John 10:10). Gloria then asks Vito if he's ever felt life to the full. Yet, there is no definition of "life to the full." The assumption is that "life to the full" means a monogamous, sexual relationship. If so, why is that the definition? Would she argue that Pope Francis hasn't lived life to the full, simply because he's stayed true to his vows?
Not Rated but contains a scene of strong sexuality and nudity.
Running Time: 1 hr. and 56 mins.
In theaters August 3 at Laemmle Music Hall.
On DVD and VOD on August 7.